Blog

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled on Thursday that an insurer has the right to object to a company’s bankruptcy settlement involving asbestos mass tort claims.

This decision overturns a previous ruling by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, in the case of Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum. The appellate court had determined that the insurer could not object to the settlement because it was deemed insurance neutral.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, writing for the Supreme Court, stated, “The fact that Truck’s financial exposure may be directly and adversely affected by a plan is sufficient to give Truck a right to voice its objections.”

Kaiser Gypsum filed for bankruptcy in September 2016 due to facing 38,000 asbestos injury lawsuits dating back to 1978. In August 2021, a federal bankruptcy judge in Virginia approved its Chapter 11 reorganization plan, which included establishing a $50 million settlement trust for asbestos injury claims.

Truck Insurance Exchange, a unit of Farmers Group Inc., provided commercial general liability policies to Kaiser Gypsum from the 1960s until 1983. The focus of Truck’s objection was a 1974 policy that offered $500,000 in coverage per claim with no aggregate limit.

Despite Truck’s attempts, both a federal judge in Richmond and the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that it did not have standing to object to the reorganization plan. Truck argued that it potentially faced the financial burden of 14,000 insured claims against Kaiser Gypsum and that only uninsured claims had fraud-prevention measures.

The Supreme Court emphasized that “broad participation promotes a fair and equitable reorganization process,” highlighting that insurers like Truck, who have financial responsibility for bankruptcy claims, are indeed parties in interest.

The high court noted that neither Kaiser Gypsum nor the asbestos claimants have an incentive to limit the defense and payment of injury claims. Truck, however, “may well be the only entity with an incentive to identify problems with the plan,” it stated.

Justice Alito did not participate in the consideration or decision of the case.

Allyson N. Ho of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, representing Truck, expressed satisfaction with the ruling: “We’re very pleased that the Supreme Court unanimously held that insurers have a direct and obvious interest in their insured’s reorganization, and so have a broad right to be heard in bankruptcy cases.”

Representatives for Kaiser Gypsum did not respond to requests for comment.

A man who spent over a year cutting asbestos sheets without protective gear has received a six-figure compensation award.

David Lawrence, diagnosed with mesothelioma—a type of incurable cancer—after exposure to deadly fibers at a former builders’ merchant, expressed his dismay. The 79-year-old from Maldon, Essex, stated, “It was wrong that our former employers knowingly put us all in danger.”

Lorna Webster, the solicitor handling his case, emphasized that “no amount of compensation” could restore Mr. Lawrence’s previously good health.

In 1961, Mr. Lawrence worked in the cutting area at John Sadd & Sons in Maldon, slicing asbestos sheeting into strips for builders to use as soffits under house guttering. His solicitor noted that he was not provided with any protective equipment to prevent inhalation of asbestos dust.

Due to his diagnosis, Mr. Lawrence struggled to leave his house and had to abandon his hobbies. “It is unfair that people who worked hard like me were put in such danger by our employers,” he said. He urged anyone who has worked in similar environments to seek medical and legal help, even if the company is no longer in business.

John Sadd & Sons, established in 1729 in the coastal town, closed its doors in 1994.

Mr. Lawrence has received support from the London Asbestos Support Awareness Group (LASAG), although the exact amount of his compensation remains undisclosed.

Mesothelioma is a cancer that develops in the lining covering the outer surface of some of the body’s organs, typically linked to asbestos exposure and currently incurable, though treatments can alleviate symptoms.

The insurance company responsible for the compensation payout was contacted for comment by the BBC.

For more Essex news, follow on Facebook, Instagram, and X. Have a story? Email [email protected] or WhatsApp at 0800 169 1830.

A man who spent over a year cutting asbestos sheets without protective gear has received a six-figure compensation. David Lawrence, diagnosed with mesothelioma, an incurable cancer, was exposed to hazardous fibres at a former builders’ merchant.

The 79-year-old from Maldon, Essex, expressed his dismay, stating, “It is wrong that our former employers knowingly put us all in danger.” His solicitor, Lorna Webster, emphasized that “no amount of compensation” could restore Mr. Lawrence’s health.

In 1961, Lawrence worked in the cutting area at John Sadd & Sons in Maldon, slicing asbestos sheeting into strips for builders to use as soffits under house guttering. His employer did not provide any protective equipment to prevent inhalation of asbestos dust.

Due to his diagnosis, Mr. Lawrence now struggles to leave his house and has had to abandon his hobbies. He remarked, “It is unfair that people who worked hard like me were put in such danger by our employers.” He urged others in similar environments to seek medical and legal help, even if their companies are no longer in business.

John Sadd & Sons, established in 1729, closed in 1994. Mr. Lawrence has received support from the London Asbestos Support Awareness Group (LASAG), though the exact compensation amount remains undisclosed.

Mesothelioma, a cancer affecting the lining of some body organs, is typically linked to asbestos exposure and is incurable, though treatments can alleviate symptoms. The insurance company responsible for the payout was contacted for comment by the BBC.

Parramatta Eels Urged to Reconsider Sponsorship Deal with James Hardie

!ABC Privacy Collection Statement.

Email address: [Enter your email address]

I never intended to become a housing rights advocate; my dream was to be an artist, as painting has always been my passion. However, life had other plans for me, and it feels like I missed a crucial turn on the highway, leaving me unable to go back.

My journey began in 2018 when my family moved into a housing association flat on the Eastfields estate in Mitcham, south London. It was my father, my two sisters (aged 17 and 20), and 19-year-old me. Prior to that, we lived in temporary accommodation—a half-converted garage plagued with mold, damp walls, and a bathroom no bigger than a cupboard. We had been waiting for permanent council housing since 2016, but the new flat was no improvement. The carpets and wallpaper were ancient, and the place was infested with cockroaches, flies, and woodlice. The mouse problem in the kitchen was so severe that we avoided using it. The glass patio doors were broken, making the flat unbearably cold. Water-filled lights during rainstorms were common, especially in the bathroom, which had no windows. This wasn’t unique to us; the entire Eastfields estate was in a state of disrepair. Despite numerous complaints to Clarion, the housing association, nothing was ever fixed.

In late 2018, my father was diagnosed with esophageal cancer, and I believe the poor living conditions accelerated his decline. He passed away in January 2020. On the day of his funeral in February, a massive leak from a bathroom pipe caused part of the living room ceiling to collapse. Dealing with grief, lockdown during Covid, work stress, and constant complaints to Clarion made life extremely depressing. No one came to fix the ceiling until October that year. When they did, they left dust containing white asbestos everywhere after removing the old Artex. Our already poor living conditions turned into a construction site. They didn’t install a new ceiling until January of the following year, and many other issues remained unresolved.

By May 2021, I had reached my breaking point. I was working in marketing at my old secondary school and spent an entire morning calling Clarion. The person who answered was rude and dismissive, saying they were too busy to send anyone out before hanging up on me. During my break, I went home, took pictures of our living conditions, and uploaded them to Twitter (now X). The post went viral and caught the attention of national media. Clarion finally repaired the flat over the summer but issued a non-apology that read: “We apologise if Mr Tweneboa feels we haven’t provided the service expected from us.” This only fueled my frustration. Together with two members of the residents’ association, I distributed letters across the estate asking residents about their conditions. By the time we finished, my phone was inundated with messages, pictures, emails, and complaints. It was overwhelming.

From there, things snowballed. I continued uploading pictures to social media, prompting more news coverage and shaming Clarion into action. The BBC did a piece on our situation, and it gained even more attention. People from across London and Britain began contacting me—not just about housing providers and landlords but also about MPs and councillors who were failing their constituents. I traveled around the country to hold these providers accountable—essentially doing the job that MPs should have been doing.

What frustrated me most was the lack of urgency and human decency in addressing these problems. My anger stemmed not only from my father’s ordeal but also from discovering that others across Britain were suffering similarly. People were dying in their homes from asthma, skin conditions, and other illnesses related to dampness, mold, and disrepair. It infuriated me that elected officials were not adequately representing these individuals.

By this stage, my social media following had grown to include politicians and MPs. I would visit tenants’ homes, film their conditions, and upload the footage. Within 24 hours, these tenants would be moved out or found alternative permanent accommodation—something they had been fighting for years to achieve. This public shaming proved powerful but was only a fraction of the shame we residents had endured.

Now, this advocacy work is my full-time job. I continue to speak with residents and engage with news organizations. I’ve written a book on the housing crisis and frequently confront housing associations about the slum conditions people are living in, urging them to return to their original mission.

I’m still naming and shaming housing providers and striving to keep housing issues at the forefront of political discussions, especially as elections approach. Through this column, I hope to share some of the problems I encounter in my work with ordinary people.

I’ve come to understand how foundational housing is for all of us and how it intersects with issues like poverty, unemployment, crime, domestic violence, and homelessness. Decent, safe, affordable housing should be a necessity in this

Sydney’s Asbestos Crisis Unveiled: Secret Documents and Public Concerns

Sydney’s asbestos crisis has been exposed through nearly 400 pages of confidential government documents and previously unseen photos of tiny asbestos fragments discovered by the public. One of the initial pieces was found near a bus stop on Callan St in Rozelle, as revealed by 7NEWS.

WATCH THE VIDEO ABOVE: 7NEWS investigation uncovers documents revealing the extent and cost of Sydney’s asbestos contamination crisis.

The discovery led to a frantic search by authorities. Within days, the list of potentially contaminated sites expanded to include parks, schools, hospitals, and residential areas. An investigation revealed hundreds of government risk reports showing more asbestos shards in mulch garden beds.

Some images in the documents suggest that asbestos sheets may have been processed through a machine. Peter Tighe, chair of the Asbestos Diseases Research Foundation, explained, “It’s quite easy for someone who’s not fully aware of fibro asbestos sheeting products to put them into the machine. It would have come in a bonded state. But once it’s been through the shredder, it could change dramatically.”

Several sites across Sydney remain cordoned off months after the initial discovery, although many have since reopened, according to the NSW EPA. “Those circumstances, in terms of how the material ended up in the mulch, is very much a focus for our ongoing investigation,” said Adam Gilligan, NSW EPA director of operations. “A significant proportion of those 79 sites that we’ve identified have been cleaned up.”

Concerns about the substantial cost to taxpayers were also raised in the government documents. An email from the director of public works quoted a figure of $100 million. At Rozelle Parklands alone, taxpayers have already spent nearly $270,000 on a four-month contract with a testing company.

For more updates on this developing story, download the 7NEWS app today.

!Asbestos fragments found in mulch
Credit: 7NEWS

!Taped-off area suspected of asbestos contamination
Credit: 7NEWS

Related Articles:
– Fears asbestos-tainted material could have spread to Sydney homes
– More than 30 Sydney parks to be tested for asbestos
– Residents on alert after dangerous find at another Sydney park
– Worker’s $375,000 court win after exposure to deadly but common substance